Measuring Success Without Purchase Tracking

Ask CI

Capacity Interactive AUTHOR: Capacity Interactive
Jul 24, 2025
5 Min Read
Listen

Note: This post was originally published in June 2023 and updated in July 2025.

When you think about digital marketing campaigns, return on investment (ROI) likely comes to mind. But what happens when you’re running an attendance, membership, or registration campaign, and purchases largely don’t take place online or aren’t trackable?

Cultural organizations often find themselves in this predicament. Whether it’s onsite admission, off-platform registration, or pre-sale buzz, the data gaps are real.

At CI, we’re obsessed with measurement, even in scenarios that seem unmeasurable. Enter: proxy metrics. A proxy metric is something you can track that represents or approximates the value of your intended outcome. Let’s look at how we use smart, strategic proxy metrics to measure campaign performance for the cultural organizations we work with.

TAKE A CUE FROM WEBSITE VIEWS

We rely on website views as our key performance indicator (KPI) to approximate attendance driven by digital campaigns. We build out tracking to record specific page visits on a user’s journey after seeing one of our ads. For example, did someone visit the calendar or the “Plan a Visit” page? Did they click to learn more about a specific exhibition? These actions are pretty good indicators of intent to visit.

  • In Action: One of our clients is a major art museum that offers free general admission. Certain exhibitions have paid timed entry, but even those purchases often happen onsite. In March 2023, the museum ran three campaigns across Google placements: an exhibition-specific display campaign, an exhibition-specific YouTube campaign, and an ongoing institutional paid search campaign.
  • The Results
    In Action: We work with a small academic museum that only charges a nominal admission fee upon entry for those unaffiliated with the college. We regularly run short flights on Meta promoting general awareness of the museum and rely on proxy metrics like website views to measure campaign success. In December, the museum ran a week-long campaign with ads that featured a visually striking special exhibition and linked to that exhibition’s landing page.
  • The Results

TRACK INTENT TO PURCHASE

Even when we can see online purchase data, we rarely see the complete picture. Most museum visitors purchase admission upon arrival. (One museum we work with estimates that only about 20% of their visitors buy online!) And sometimes ticketing platforms don’t have the proper infrastructure to allow for accurate tracking. But luckily, we’ve found a workaround.

In these scenarios, we continue to use page views as a strong approximator, but we also introduce another proxy metric: clicks to the ticketing platform. We can build a custom solution that tracks every time someone clicks on the “purchase” button on a museum’s website to bring the user to the ticketing platform.

  • In Action: An NYC-based museum in our client roster couldn’t verify its ticketing domain, so our view of online purchase data has been incomplete. To provide the most robust view of the data possible, we report on three key metrics: page views, clicks to the ticketing platform, and purchases. While none of these metrics individually can provide a full picture, all three combined give a reasonably comprehensive view of campaign performance. Let’s look at how these proxy metrics worked together for the museum’s Meta campaign this past fall and winter.
  • The Results

Take names

Sometimes success means getting ready for future conversion before a sale even begins. That’s where lead generation campaigns come in. These efforts are particularly helpful when registration or ticket sales aren’t live yet, but building a list now will pay dividends later.

  • In Action & Results: This client is a university-affiliated performing arts center that wanted to gather interest ahead of their new season and campus opening. Their lead generation campaign generated nearly 300 leads at a cost of $3.48 per lead ($1.35 lower than their last lead gen campaign in 2024). Notably, most leads came from a mid-funnel Engagers / Lookalikes audience, turning anonymous internet friends into real names in their database for future marketing efforts.

READY TO REGISTER

When organizations can’t track registrations directly (whether due to technical limitations or offline processes) leads become a critical success metric. 

  • In Action: We partnered with two different music education programs to generate warm lead lists for their summer camps. Given the high price tags on these camps, even a handful of registrations from these lists would result in a sky-high ROI on the lead generation investment. As with the previous example, mid-funnel audiences (like Video Viewers, Engagers, and Lookalikes) tended to drive leads most efficiently.
  • The ResultsTable with campaign reporting that shows a DC-area music camp received more leads at a lower cost per lead vs. a Boston area music camp

THE BOTTOM LINE

There’s no one-size-fits-all approach to reporting campaign success. Every organization has different goals, limitations, and backend systems—which is exactly why our team is so committed to finding the right strategy, no matter the tracking scenario.

Whether it’s website behavior, ticketing clicks, or lead generation, we provide cultural organizations with custom-fit measurement solutions that give a clear picture of performance (even when the data isn’t crystal clear).